Chris Brunet is the one time protégé of Manhattan Institute activist Chris Rufo, for whom he did the investigative legwork into Claudine Gay’s plagiarism.
you lost me at "Jewess". In any case, I couldn't possibly devote any part of my Saturday downtime to reading something that appears to be too many words to make a point.
This is a perfect example of why smart people should only buy their 'shrooms from reputable dealers and not the toothless meth-head on the street corner closest to his tent in the "homeless" encampment.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading an author who seems to glimpse the truth of the false-promise of the inevitable second term of President Trump and presents their arguments with a vocabulary that elicits pangs of jealousy.
While the author hails Brunet twice but not thrice--I will have to read the essay thrice to be sure that I can make what rebuttals I sense are necessary. I think the most likely cause of my sense that their is something not quite perfect is in the argument that seems to be advanced in favor of supporting unprincipled and Machiavellian methods in the name of victory.
Without Principles we are lost. Without Integrity we are lost.
The ends do not justify the means. The means are our lives and the ends are the Lord's.
"...we have to employ calculated, smart tactics, avoiding head-on firefights with the enemy. But we can harry him from hill and ravine of narrative climbs, intercept his indoctrination of rising generations..."
Pretty much just said something similar on X, though with a view to intercepting the "crabs in a bucket" effort to corral those escaping the normie plantations and seeking new "verboten" directions ...
Well articulated and worth the read, reminds of John Carter’s style. Like.
Who is John Carter?
https://substack.com/@barsoom
I would not be surprised too much if I was informed that this author was a Chris Brunet pseudonym.
you lost me at "Jewess". In any case, I couldn't possibly devote any part of my Saturday downtime to reading something that appears to be too many words to make a point.
Filtered.
Pretty anti-semetic of you to stop reading because the author includes female Jews in his work.
That’s an incorrect, and what I would say is an unenlightened reading of my comment.
Please, enlighten me.
Yappersville
You are Jewish.
This is a perfect example of why smart people should only buy their 'shrooms from reputable dealers and not the toothless meth-head on the street corner closest to his tent in the "homeless" encampment.
You just restacked a "Yuri Bezmenov" themed blog, but thanks for your input.
I never heard of you before Yuri posted something about you.
bro, you just restacked a Bari Weiss article
Brilliant.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading an author who seems to glimpse the truth of the false-promise of the inevitable second term of President Trump and presents their arguments with a vocabulary that elicits pangs of jealousy.
While the author hails Brunet twice but not thrice--I will have to read the essay thrice to be sure that I can make what rebuttals I sense are necessary. I think the most likely cause of my sense that their is something not quite perfect is in the argument that seems to be advanced in favor of supporting unprincipled and Machiavellian methods in the name of victory.
Without Principles we are lost. Without Integrity we are lost.
The ends do not justify the means. The means are our lives and the ends are the Lord's.
Our principles are our interests.
Then you are lost, Juden.
Only someone without principles would conflate a principle with an interest.
The ends will not justify the means.
Take it up with Machiavelli, Thucydides, Nietzsche (I checked their early life and they're not Jews).
You wouldn't brazenly assert those authors as exemplars if you knew who their Paul Singer’s were.
Thucydides lived off his parents estates, and Machiavelli was a Medici- glazier.
Paul Singer as a transhistorical malevolence, now that must be the final redpill.
"...we have to employ calculated, smart tactics, avoiding head-on firefights with the enemy. But we can harry him from hill and ravine of narrative climbs, intercept his indoctrination of rising generations..."
Pretty much just said something similar on X, though with a view to intercepting the "crabs in a bucket" effort to corral those escaping the normie plantations and seeking new "verboten" directions ...
Egad. So much energy dissecting someone else; a soap opera of Grade B movie characters.
Extraordinarily disrespectful for you to comment glibly on something so clearly erudite and inspiring.
If for no reason other than the enrichment of your vocabulary.